Sometimes I wonder how many percent of the population in the ongoing debate on fluoride. It 'definitely a growing voice of dissent about the fluoridation of drinking water, but the average Joe is as familiar with this problem. I know I am not aware that most of my friends and family. I never heard that brought him on all major TV news programs. It seems that most of the information from radio, local news stations to come, scientists and activistsOrganizations. It means that there is not much to this debate, or are about to enter in the national spotlight?
Fluoridation of water supplies has occurred public for more than 60 years. In light of these basic facts of history, is the immediate problem in many nations come to mind when confronted with the debate: "If fluoride is so bad for us, we have not already figured it would be mountains of evidence for this? Show toxicEffects? "Opponents argue that this test is not, and must do more to respond to illustrate this truth. Proponent that the evidence for fluoride is deep and well-funded studies already there with the population of the United States in reducing tooth decay 'order of 50-60% compared to the second World War. This statistic is one of the most controversial, since these same reductions in the same periods in countries that have never been to fluoridation of drinking water has shown commitment.
SodiumFluoride, fluorine is used, an ex-products and waste from the production of aluminum, and is a common ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, anesthetics, hypnotics, psychiatric drugs and military nerve gas. Fluoride is more toxic than aluminum, and studies have shown that fluoride increases the absorption rate of aluminum consumption by 600%. There are, however, the controls set instead of managing that risk. The EPA has a maximum level of water fluoridation at 1 ppm part (for setMillion) of fluoride toothpaste on the back reads "Keep toothpaste out of the reach of children under 6 years. If swallowed, medical help or contact poison control center immediately."
That there is no doubt that fluoride damages bones, causing stiffness, promotes skeletal abnormalities, increased risk of cancer, genetic damage occurs and prevents the nervous system function in humans. The opponents of fluoridation are concerned that because fluoride acts as a cumulative poison graduallyEffects on the body over time depends on the potential toxicity, how much water is consumed on a daily basis to filter the user's body weight and the ability of the body and eliminate the chemicals. These are by far the variables with which a relatively high percentage of the population may fall into a vast toxic over time.
Recently, studies have government, the evidence was fluoridation dangers. In a 2005 CDC study showed irreversible enamel fluorosis in one of three children.Then, in 2007, the ADA warned parents not to mix infant formula with tap water in the first 12 months of development, in order to avoid the intake of fluoride. More recently, in June 2008 stated that the National Kidney Foundation of kidney patients of the potential risk of fluoride exposure should be disclosed.
Each year our scientists to understand more and more of the toxic effects of fluoride, and a point is impressive. With the fluoridation of drinking water, you can not control theIngested dose, children and adults treated with similar doses, and unless the public filter their water, have no choice. At a minimum, should be larger and more comprehensive studies carried out in order to respond adequately to ensure that varying dosage and the benefits clearly outweigh the risks.
Meanwhile, for those interested, there is no fluoride water filter on the market. Berkey is a highly respected Filter PF-2 fluoride that works in allBerkey water filter system.
No comments:
Post a Comment